U.S. Senate Details CLARITY Act: Seven Key Points Balancing Investor Protection and Innovation

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】The U.S. Senate Banking Committee recently published an in-depth analysis of the “CLARITY Act,” addressing common misconceptions in the market one by one. This interpretation covers seven core aspects.

First, the act does not break through the existing securities law framework but is based on mature securities law principles, aiming to clearly distinguish which digital assets should be classified as securities and which have commodity attributes. Second, the fundamental nature of the CLARITY Act is an investor protection measure, establishing a clear rule system to combat fraud, manipulation, and market abuse, thereby preventing major risk events like FTX from recurring.

In terms of regulatory authority, the act clarifies the respective responsibilities of the SEC and CFTC, and establishes a joint advisory committee for rule coordination, filling current regulatory gaps. It also introduces targeted anti-avoidance provisions to effectively reduce regulatory arbitrage. Regarding financial intermediaries, the act requires them to implement anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing obligations, strengthen sanctions compliance, and authorize enforcement by the Treasury Department.

For the DeFi ecosystem, the act does not allow it to become an illegal fund channel but emphasizes precise crackdowns on illegal activities. It requires centralized intermediaries interacting with DeFi protocols to establish risk management standards and sets specific rules for intermediaries that are not truly decentralized, protecting code innovation while preventing risks.

The act explicitly protects the rights of software developers and users to self-custody, and does not classify developers who do not control user funds and only publish or maintain code as financial intermediaries. Meanwhile, regulatory agencies retain the necessary intervention capabilities for genuine risks.

Overall, the core goal of the CLARITY Act is to strengthen national security, protect investors’ rights, and promote compliant innovation within a clear rule framework, rather than favoring specific industries.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasWastervip
· 6h ago
Interesting, finally someone wants to clarify this matter. That wave of FTX really shook the entire community. It's a bit late for CLARITY now, but it's still better than chaos all along, right?
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomniavip
· 9h ago
It's the same old "protect investors" rhetoric, but the real question is—who will protect us from being screwed over by these very rules?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenixvip
· 01-14 12:30
Remember, when losing money, it's most important to stay clear-headed. The CLARITY Act is actually preparing the market for rebirth and transformation. [Laughing with tears]
View OriginalReply0
TokenAlchemistvip
· 01-14 12:29
ngl, sec vs cftc turf wars finally getting some structure... but that anti-arbitrage clause gonna crush every inefficiency vector we've been surfing. rip the golden age of regulatory gaps lol
Reply0
TokenomicsDetectivevip
· 01-14 12:29
Another official whitewashing statement, no matter how nicely it's phrased, isn't it just trying to give the project team more escape routes...
View OriginalReply0
OffchainWinnervip
· 01-14 12:17
Is it the CLARITY Act again? Feels like they're just making empty promises again? Can the SEC and CFTC really coordinate effectively?
View OriginalReply0
StillBuyingTheDipvip
· 01-14 12:17
Here come the rules again. Can they really control those scammers this time? --- Basically, it's about clearly distinguishing securities from commodities. I'm too lazy to get into these conceptual battles anymore. --- After FTX, this was bound to happen, but execution is the key. --- Joint Advisory Committee? Sounds like they're going to hold a bunch of useless meetings again. --- Anti-avoidance clauses are quite crucial; I'm just worried someone might still find a loophole.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeartvip
· 01-14 12:07
Here to clear up the misunderstanding again, talking about investor protection here, but isn't it just an excuse to give more power to the SEC and CFTC?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt