#比特币2026年行情展望 The Truth Behind $ETH Financing Information: The "Transparency Trap" in Web3 Projects

Recently, there's been an interesting phenomenon—many Web3 projects have noticeable gaps in their funding details. The data analysis platform RootData has issued a transparency alert, publicly pointing out that projects like MBD Financials, Geeq, Waterfall Network, Synthesys, Rubix, and others have incomplete financing information and unclear disclosures. This actually reflects an old issue in the industry: how should investors accurately identify the true situation of a project?

Want to quickly determine if a project is worth paying attention to? Consider its "Transparency Score." This evaluation system grades from A to F—A indicates complete and timely information, while F signifies incomplete data, like a black box. The lower the score, the greater the hidden risks. For investors, this metric almost becomes a practical "risk-avoidance checklist."

The platform's stance is clear: encourage all project teams to proactively submit or update their financing information. The more transparent the disclosure, the higher the score. Meanwhile, RootData continues to monitor—those projects that hide key information for a long time and refuse to disclose core details will eventually be marked. The entire ecosystem needs clear and transparent information flow, not vague guesses.

What information do you care most about when making investment decisions? Have you ever suffered losses due to opaque disclosures? Feel free to share your thoughts.