Let me break down this allocation honestly.

Your BTC dominance at 85% isn't wrong—Bitcoin remains the flagship asset and largest liquidity pool. But that's also textbook risk-averse positioning. You're essentially betting the farm on one narrative, even if it's the most established one.

ETH at 5% feels undersized given its ecosystem size and DeFi dominance. If you believe in smart contracts and protocol development, this seems like hedge territory rather than conviction.

SOL's 5% mirrors your ETH bet. Reasonable exposure without overcommitting, though you're clearly not chasing layer-1 competition narratives hard.

Now here's where it gets interesting—MEE at 3% and WXT at 2%. These smaller positions scream "lottery tickets" or "conviction plays on emerging narratives." Are these proven projects with real adoption metrics, or speculative bets? Without context, they look like you're reserving a tiny slice for asymmetric upside while keeping your core conservative.

The honest take? This portfolio reads as "I trust Bitcoin most, hedge my bets elsewhere, but won't pretend to have edge in picking winners." That's mature thinking. But it also means you're probably not maximizing returns if those smaller caps deliver. Trade-off between sleep-at-night allocation versus frontier-market hunting.