Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
The charm of DeFi lies in transparency, but this transparency has also become a nightmare for institutional finance.
Imagine: you are a trader at an asset management firm, and every loan, liquidity provision, and even the entire asset allocation is publicly available across the network. Your opponents can see where you add positions, predict when you might get liquidated, and manipulate the market accordingly. In such an environment, how can traditional finance dare to enter on a large scale?
This is precisely the key bottleneck that has long prevented DeFi from breaking into mainstream adoption. Blockchain’s transparency indeed attracts early retail users and developers, but for institutions managing billions of dollars in assets, this "full disclosure" is like exposing all tactics in front of the enemy. Risk management positions are exposed, trading strategies can be copied, and fund flows can be targeted—these are real vulnerabilities for market manipulation.
Some projects are beginning to recognize this issue. Take Dusk Network as an example; it is building the underlying infrastructure for an "institutional-grade DeFi," and the solution boils down to one word: privacy-first.
How exactly does it work? The core is zero-knowledge proof cryptography tools. Liquidity providers can stake and provide liquidity on Dusk without revealing specific asset sizes and compositions. They only need to use ZK proofs to demonstrate they have sufficient funds, without disclosing the actual numbers. This approach protects commercial secrets while ensuring protocol security.
The same logic applies to lending protocols. Suppose you are a borrower; your collateral details are supposed to be public, but lenders need to know whether you might be liquidated. Dusk’s solution is: use ZK proofs to verify that your liquidation threshold is safe, without exposing all collateral details. This prevents targeted attacks on your collateral and ensures fair market execution.
But this is not the most imaginative part.
Dusk supports the creation of "permissioned" or "consortium" application chains. Imagine financial giants like Morgan Stanley or Goldman Sachs building a private DeFi market accessible only to member institutions based on Dusk’s technology. In this market, institutions can conduct large-scale OTC derivatives trading, repo transactions, and settle complex structured products.
Most importantly: transactions are private—they are invisible externally—but the encrypted summaries of all transaction activities are synchronized to the Dusk mainnet. What does this mean? It means that while transaction details remain confidential, settlement certainty and auditability are guaranteed. There’s no room for black-box operations, but it also doesn’t expose tactics due to full transparency.
This is like a "safe transition zone" from private/consortium chains to a more open public chain ecosystem. Traditional finance doesn’t need to jump directly into fully open DeFi; they can first test the waters in this intermediate space and gradually adapt to encrypted financial logic.
Dusk’s true value is not to overthrow existing DeFi but to solve the core barriers faced by institutionalization and open up a brand new market. The trillions of dollars in traditional finance that are still on the sidelines have been waiting for such an infrastructure—one that offers both privacy and transparent verification.
Essentially, Dusk is building a trust bridge between TradFi and DeFi. It recognizes that markets need privacy and also require compliance verification. This is a more realistic and more easily accepted path for institutions than simply pursuing "complete transparency."