Cryptocurrency ownership disputes escalate again. A dispute over XRP asset distribution has intensified in court— the defendant, accused of misappropriating over $11 million worth of XRP, recently filed a counterclaim, denying the theft charges and instead claiming that these digital assets are jointly accumulated wealth from years of a relationship through savvy crypto investment decisions, and should be legally shared accordingly.

The case dates back to last year when the defendant was accused of misappropriating approximately $400,000 in cash and over 5.5 million XRP. However, now his legal team has shifted strategies—not just passive defense but proactive offense—claiming that these assets are fundamentally jointly created wealth. This turn highlights a complex issue: how does the law define asset ownership and value creation in the crypto investment space?

This case has sparked considerable reflection. It not only involves a trading dispute over XRP, a mainstream crypto asset, but also touches on the gray areas of property rights in the digital age. Especially when concepts like "crypto investment" and "joint wealth" enter traditional legal frameworks, conventional asset distribution logic faces new challenges. For individuals or families holding crypto assets, the final outcome of such cases could serve as an important reference.