The community's stance is clear here—this is what collective consensus looks like. When the majority agrees it's time to move on from a project, that's when real governance happens. It's the community that ultimately decides which projects thrive and which don't.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
UnruggableChadvip
· 5h ago
Basically, it's the Gresham's Law in action—bad money drives out good money. The tyranny of the majority is just as prevalent in crypto.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmilingvip
· 23h ago
This is what Web3 should look like; community decision-making is true governance.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncervip
· 23h ago
What can community voting change? Isn't it just the big players calling the shots?
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologisvip
· 23h ago
The replacement of on-chain civilization ultimately comes down to human will. Just like the silence of ancient ruins, it often begins with collective silence.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truthervip
· 23h ago
Basically, it's whoever has the loudest voice that gets to decide. Is that called consensus? I think, actually, most people haven't thought it through clearly.
View OriginalReply0
DarkPoolWatchervip
· 23h ago
That's correct, but the real issue is that sometimes the majority opinion is manipulated by a few big players.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)