Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Bitcoin's Decentralized Architecture Does Not Provide Full Protection Against Regulatory Pressures
Recent statements by Bitcoin pioneer Nick Szabo offer an important perspective on the true reliability of crypto assets in the face of legal and regulatory challenges. Szabo emphasizes that despite the network’s technical superiority and strong encryption mechanisms, Bitcoin is not fully protected within the global regulatory framework.
Although Bitcoin is often described as “invincible” in the cryptocurrency market, it is actually subject to significant restrictions beyond its decentralized structure. Szabo’s warning highlights the importance of distinguishing between technological resilience and regulatory risks. The network’s security based on intensive computational power is effective against certain types of attacks but is not operational in the face of government legal interventions or international coordinated restrictions.
From Szabo’s perspective, Bitcoin’s resilience should be evaluated at the technical infrastructure level, but macro-level regulatory pressures should be considered as a separate risk category. The increasing regulation of cryptocurrencies in the global financial system has become one of the determining factors for the long-term position of blockchain-based assets. Even if decentralized networks remain operational, regulatory focus is intensifying on the legal status and access rights of users.
In this context, the balance between Bitcoin’s strength and its vulnerabilities needs to be more realistically assessed by investors and developers. Szabo’s warning underscores the importance of considering technological innovation and regulatory realism simultaneously.