Regarding the recent trust crisis in a certain ecosystem project, this incident itself is not directly related to exchange operations, but it indeed touches on a deeper issue—community trust.

The sequence of events is quite clear: first, community opinion leaders and project leaders successively paid attention to a certain developer, then the project retweeted an article related to tokens and publicly expressed support for ecosystem development. This series of actions may seem like normal project interactions, but in subsequent public opinion developments, many began to reflect on whether these signals were over-interpreted.

To be honest, we often fall into the trap of self-interpretation—once we see a slight movement, we imagine the whole story, and then operate frequently under FOMO. Even if we lose money, we still say it's our own problem, but there is a more important aspect being overlooked: transparent communication from the project team.

The key point is that when doubts arise in the community, the project team should provide a formal, clear response rather than allowing an information vacuum to continue fermenting. This is not just a PR issue but concerns the long-term trust foundation of the ecosystem. Whether a project can go far ultimately depends on the level of trust between the project and the community.