2026-01-13 00:47:23

Meta just made a significant leadership move by bringing on board a veteran from the Trump administration. The social media giant elevated him to president and vice chairman, signaling a strategic shift in how the company plans to navigate Washington.

This hire speaks volumes about Meta's approach to policy and regulation. With tech companies facing increasing scrutiny from Congress and various government agencies, having someone with strong political connections at the helm matters. The appointee brings substantial experience in navigating complex governmental relationships, which could prove invaluable as Meta tackles antitrust concerns, content moderation debates, and emerging regulations around AI and digital platforms.

The appointment reflects a broader trend in Silicon Valley: tech giants are doubling down on their Washington playbooks. As the regulatory landscape continues to shift, especially with new administration policies rolling out, Meta's bet on experienced political operators suggests the company is preparing for a more interventionist governmental approach.

For the crypto and Web3 communities watching from the sidelines, Meta's leadership restructuring is worth monitoring. The company's metaverse ambitions and blockchain initiatives could be directly impacted by how effectively new leadership manages regulatory relationships. Whether this move accelerates Meta's crypto endeavors or simply reinforces the company's traditional power-brokering strategy remains to be seen.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEV_Whisperer

· 01-15 00:30

NGL Meta is playing political games again. Web3 communities have seen this routine too many times. --- Another Washington insider stepping into the executive team... Can they really promote crypto development? --- Is Meta paving the way for the metaverse or just engaging in pure power games... Hard to understand. --- With regulatory pressure so intense, Silicon Valley is already cozying up to politicians. What about Web3? --- Basically, it's about spending money to buy political influence. That's been the way in the crypto world all along. --- Whether this guy can handle crypto policies is the key... Let's wait and see. --- Meta's move... Will the blockchain side benefit? Can't say for sure. --- It's the same old Washington tricks. Who believes this can truly drive innovation? --- The crypto community is just watching the show. Can this change anything? --- Is this power play beneficial for Meta or Web3? Just thinking about it gives me a headache.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdviser

· 01-13 15:59

Lobbi game again? Is Meta really serious about this? By the way, can this guy loosen the restrictions on the metaverse, or is he just talking nonsense... The old Silicon Valley trick, just spend money to buy policies. Don't expect much from the crypto community; Meta only cares about advertising revenue. What does this move look like? Can it really change anything? Betting on political dividends—true to Meta's style.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBeggar

· 01-13 01:17

Meta is playing political games again, bringing in someone from the Trump era as the second-in-command—truly a fancy way to curry favor. Wait, can this guy promote the metaverse and on-chain projects if he gets into office? Feels like the old tricks. Tech giants are like this—when faced with regulation, they just go to politicians to build relationships. Web3 community continues to watch and wait. Are they really treating Meta as DC's lobbying organization? That's hilarious. If this could help the crypto circle get out of trouble, it would be worth it, haha.

View OriginalReply0

FloorSweeper

· 01-13 01:16

Nah Meta is back to playing political games, this routine is so common. Wait, are they really going to do crypto or just keep fooling us? That bunch in Silicon Valley really treats Washington as their home, hilarious. Meta's move is actually quite clever, but who knows for us Web3 players. It's all about political connections and regulatory relationships, in plain terms, just spending money to smooth things over. If this guy could really push the metaverse and blockchain, that would be interesting, but I bet five bucks he won't.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerForever

· 01-13 01:15

Meta is trying to play the political card... Can they loosen restrictions on Web3? I'm skeptical.

View OriginalReply0

wagmi_eventually

· 01-13 01:04

Meta is starting the power game again, and the Web3 community is really watching the show. --- It's the same old Washington playbook; tech giants have learned to latch onto big players. --- So, if you want to make it in the US, you need someone in Washington. Meta is playing this move well. --- Will there really be progress in blockchain, or will it continue to be just a mascot? --- Haha, here we go again. Big companies are competing for political connections, and that's the real competition. --- Meta is probably trying to use political relationships to bypass antitrust scrutiny. Got it. --- People from the Trump era joining Meta—what kind of benefits could this bring to Web3? --- Basically, it's about spending money to buy a protective umbrella—an old trick in Silicon Valley. --- The metaverse side probably still relies on this new CEO to smooth out relationships. --- Having someone to speak in Washington is indeed important, but do they dare to touch cryptocurrency?

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-13 01:02

It's the game of power again. Meta is really planning to exit? --- These Silicon Valley folks really treat Washington like a secondary market. --- Wait, what are they still doing with the metaverse? That's hilarious. --- By the way, can this guy really help Meta handle the antitrust issues? I remain skeptical. --- The crypto community should wake up. Meta's blockchain dream might end like this. --- It's very typical. When they can't innovate, they start spending money to buy relationships. --- This is called a dimensionality reduction attack—directly bringing Washington insiders in.

View OriginalReply0