
A GSN node acts as an intermediary service in decentralized applications (DApps) that relays transactions and sponsors gas fees on behalf of users. This enables users to interact with the blockchain without needing to hold ETH themselves, often powering features such as “gasless onboarding” or “promotional gas sponsorship” for smoother user experiences.
Within the Gas Station Network, a GSN node receives “meta-transactions” submitted by users or the DApp frontend—these are user-signed calls that are not directly sent on-chain. The node validates and packages these meta-transactions, pays the gas fees, and broadcasts them to the network. Sponsorship rules and payment settlements are managed by smart contracts, ensuring a transparent process for payment authorization, validation, and accounting.
The operational flow of a GSN node is: user signs, node verifies and pays, contract records and settles.
Typically, this process involves four steps:
Because there are additional steps like signature validation and forwarding, transactions relayed through GSN nodes consume slightly more gas than direct calls. However, this trade-off results in a much smoother onboarding experience for new users.
GSN nodes and meta-transactions are complementary: a meta-transaction is akin to “you sign, I pay and deliver,” with the GSN node acting as the service provider that covers the transaction fee and relays it on-chain.
A meta-transaction means the user signs a transaction payload but does not submit it on-chain or pay gas directly. The GSN node validates this signature and packages it into a standard on-chain transaction. The widely used standard is EIP-2771, which defines how a trusted forwarder securely transmits the original user address to the target contract—ensuring reliable caller identification.
The core components of a GSN node include: Forwarder contracts, Paymaster contracts, relay server process, and recipient contracts.
Deploying and configuring a GSN node involves several steps:
GSN nodes are used in DApps by relaying meta-transactions from the frontend, paying gas fees on behalf of users, allowing contracts to identify true senders, and executing business logic.
Common use cases include first-time NFT minting, claiming event airdrops, on-chain check-ins, or linking social identities—situations where you want to eliminate gas barriers for users. For example, when a new user accesses your DApp with Gate’s Web3 wallet to mint their first NFT, the frontend may display “gas sponsored by project.” After signing, the GSN node relays the transaction; the contract uses the Forwarder to identify the actual user and completes minting.
To prevent abuse, DApps typically enforce rules in the Paymaster: daily limits per address, task whitelists, CAPTCHAs or point requirements, along with backend risk scoring and blacklist synchronization.
The primary costs of operating a GSN node are associated with gas fees, failed retries, and basic infrastructure expenses. Since additional validation and forwarding steps are involved, transactions relayed via GSN nodes generally consume more gas than direct submissions. Overall sponsorship costs can also fluctuate significantly with changes in gas prices.
Key risks include:
All fund-related configurations should be tested thoroughly on testnets before mainnet deployment. Implement comprehensive monitoring and rollback procedures.
Compared to EIP-4337 (account abstraction), GSN nodes differ in flow and account model. EIP-4337 leverages smart accounts (via Bundlers processing UserOperations) and supports sponsored transactions through Paymasters—but requires specialized accounts and tooling. GSN nodes act as an external relay layer that works with existing EOA users and requires fewer changes to legacy contracts.
Relative to custom “backend gas sponsorship” solutions, GSN nodes offer standardized signature verification/forwarding, clear security boundaries, and a mature tooling ecosystem; however, they introduce extra contract interactions and some complexity/gas overhead. For small-scale events or limited campaigns, lightweight sponsorship or whitelist-based airdrops may suffice; for products prioritizing robust user experience and compliance controls over time, GSN nodes offer greater stability.
As of public information available today, OpenGSN continues active maintenance supporting Ethereum mainnet and multiple Layer 2 networks. With growing adoption of account abstraction, demand for gas sponsorship remains strong but implementation options are diversifying. Emerging trends include more granular sponsorship policies, deeper integration with risk control systems, unified cross-chain node management tools, and parallel deployment with EIP-4337 to serve different products and audiences.
Additionally, Layer 2’s low fees and high throughput make GSN nodes especially cost-effective for event-driven use cases. Advancements in cross-chain infrastructure and modular tooling are pushing toward standardization in node operation tools and monitoring systems.
GSN nodes provide an intermediary relay layer that sponsors gas fees for users—focusing on secure validation and transparent settlement. The standard flow is: frontend generates meta-transaction → GSN node relays → Forwarder contract ensures user identity → Paymaster handles sponsorship/reimbursement. Deployment involves selecting networks/components, setting up risk controls/limits, securing keys/funds management.
When choosing between solutions: GSN nodes are not mutually exclusive with EIP-4337—GSN is best for quickly lowering entry barriers for EOA users; EIP-4337 is suited for advanced account abstraction products. Regardless of choice, cost control and risk management must be integrated throughout design, launch, and operations.
Running a GSN node requires modest hardware—typically a dual-core CPU, 4GB RAM, and 20GB storage is sufficient for entry-level usage. Actual specifications depend on transaction volume and network conditions; production environments with higher throughput should consider at least a quad-core CPU with 8GB RAM. Choosing reliable cloud servers or professional hosting ensures both uptime and consistent rewards.
GSN node earnings come from sharing fees collected for relayed transactions; actual revenue depends on transaction volume across the network and your set fee rates. Early-stage monthly earnings may range from hundreds to thousands in local currency; as network activity grows, so does earning potential. Note that competition among nodes and fluctuations in gas prices affect profits—regularly review your fee strategy to stay competitive.
If your GSN node goes offline, you cannot relay transactions during downtime—resulting in missed earning opportunities but not fines or fund losses. The system will automatically redirect traffic to other available nodes to maintain DApp user experience. Implement monitoring alerts and auto-restart scripts to keep your node online for maximum profitability.
Gate is primarily an exchange and asset management platform—it does not offer direct GSN node deployment services. To run a GSN node you need to purchase your own server or use cloud providers (such as AWS or Alibaba Cloud), then follow official GSN documentation for setup. You can use Gate’s platform to manage earnings collected from node operations.
An Ethereum full node stores the complete blockchain data for validating transactions; a GSN node is a lightweight relay service focused mainly on sponsoring gas fees for users. GSN nodes require significantly fewer resources—they do not sync the entire chain—and have more specialized functionality. For those primarily interested in ecosystem participation or fee earnings, running a GSN node is far more cost-efficient than operating a full Ethereum node.


