
Bitcoin’s maximum supply refers to the hard cap on the total number of bitcoins that can ever exist, set at 21 million by its protocol. This is akin to a “limited edition” issuance—no one can change this upper limit to create more bitcoins beyond it.
This cap is enforced not by promises, but by rules encoded in the protocol. The “block reward” given to miners for each new block—essentially the network’s payment for maintaining security—decreases according to a fixed schedule. Over time, this reduction ensures that the total amount of bitcoins issued will approach but never exceed 21 million.
The 21 million cap was chosen by Satoshi Nakamoto when designing Bitcoin’s issuance curve. The block reward started at 50 BTC per block, halving approximately every four years. Adding up all rewards across each halving period forms a declining geometric series that converges toward 21 million.
Put simply: The first phase provided a 50 BTC reward for about 210,000 blocks; the next phase, 25 BTC; then 12.5 BTC; and so on. This “wage halving” schedule means new coins are minted at a decreasing rate, with the cumulative total steadily approaching the 21 million cap.
This number also takes practical divisibility into account. The smallest unit of bitcoin is the “satoshi” (1 bitcoin = 100 million satoshis), so 21 million BTC combined with high divisibility ensures both scarcity and usability for payments.
Bitcoin’s maximum supply is strictly enforced by consensus rules. Full nodes verify that each new block’s reward and total output do not exceed allowed amounts—if a block violates this rule, it is rejected. Miners cannot bypass node validation, so arbitrary inflation is impossible.
These rules are embedded in both code and protocol, including block reward halvings, transaction structure and value checks, and uniform rule enforcement across all nodes. Changing Bitcoin’s supply cap would require a disruptive hard fork, with nearly all ecosystem participants (miners, nodes, users) upgrading to new rules—a scenario that would likely split the network and is virtually unfeasible in practice.
Bitcoin’s maximum supply is closely linked to its halving mechanism—the block reward is cut in half roughly every four years, resulting in a declining issuance rate and decreasing inflation that approaches zero over time.
For example, after each halving, miners receive fewer new bitcoins per block. Over the long term, new issuance will dwindle until it is nearly exhausted, with the final fraction released far in the future. This process drives the total supply closer to—but never beyond—the 21 million limit.
Bitcoin’s maximum supply is the protocol-enforced upper limit, while circulating supply is the amount currently available and tradable in the market. They are not the same: lost coins (due to lost private keys) or coins locked in contracts reduce circulating supply but do not affect the maximum cap.
For trading and pricing, market capitalization is typically calculated by multiplying price by circulating supply. Understanding this difference helps interpret price movements and scarcity: the cap shapes long-term scarcity, while circulating supply determines current market liquidity.
You can find key data related to Bitcoin’s maximum supply on Gate’s market pages.
Step 1: Open Gate and go to the Bitcoin market page to access its basic information module.
Step 2: Look for fields such as “circulating supply,” “market capitalization,” and “issuance details.” The maximum supply is fixed at 21 million, but pages usually highlight current circulating supply and market cap—field names may vary based on actual display.
Step 3: Combine candlestick charts and trading data to see how market price reacts to effective supply (circulating coins), while keeping in mind that the maximum supply is a protocol-level constraint that does not change with market dynamics.
Risk warning: All trading and holdings involve price volatility and capital risk; always assess carefully.
From a protocol and governance perspective, changing Bitcoin’s maximum supply is extremely difficult. Any attempt to increase the cap would require a hard fork and consensus among economic majority (miners, nodes, users, service providers); otherwise, it would split the network, with the new chain likely lacking security and adoption.
Other cryptocurrencies have changed their supply mechanisms via forks or launching new chains, but these are no longer part of Bitcoin’s original blockchain. The market typically “votes” with price and adoption—networks adhering to original rules benefit from stronger network effects.
The maximum supply establishes clear expectations of scarcity but does not guarantee price stability. Price is still influenced by demand, macroeconomic factors, regulation, and liquidity—sharp volatility remains a risk.
As halvings reduce block rewards over time, network security will increasingly depend on transaction fees. If on-chain transaction demand drops, fees may not be sufficient to incentivize miners, raising long-term security concerns that need dynamic balancing with user experience.
Additionally, lost private keys permanently decrease circulating supply—increasing actual scarcity but posing a financial risk for holders. Always back up and securely manage your keys.
Step 1: Review public documentation and Bitcoin Core code for reward schedule and halving logic tied to block height.
Step 2: Use a geometric series calculation—sum each halving era's rewards multiplied by expected block counts—to see how total issuance converges toward 21 million.
Step 3: Run a full node or check trusted block explorers to track total issued coins and block reward history. You'll observe that new issuance declines over time, with cumulative supply never exceeding the cap.
Tip: Data changes over time; focus on trends (declining inflation rate, rising issued percentage) rather than exact numbers at any given moment.
Bitcoin's maximum supply of 21 million is enforced by halving events and consensus rules, determining its long-term scarcity and inflation path. This differs from circulating supply: lost or locked coins affect liquidity but not the cap. When viewing market data on Gate, understanding this distinction helps interpret market cap and price fluctuations. Any attempt to change the cap would break consensus and introduce high risk—security and volatility should always be carefully considered by investors and holders.
Bitcoin's maximum supply is permanently limited to 21 million coins. This hard-coded cap cannot be changed. Mathematical algorithms ensure Bitcoin’s scarcity, giving it value properties similar to gold.
Yes, Bitcoin has a finite supply capped at 21 million coins. Around 93% have already been mined; the remainder will be mined by around 2140. This design makes Bitcoin a truly scarce digital asset with deflationary characteristics.
The cap is core to Bitcoin’s design—to counteract unlimited fiat money printing. By fixing supply, Bitcoin avoids inflation and serves as a long-term store of value. This also incentivizes miners to continue securing the network.
Currently, about 19.5 million bitcoins have been mined—about 93% of total supply. Roughly 1.5 million are left to be mined, with final issuance expected around 2140. Mining difficulty increases over time, raising future mining costs.
Bitcoin’s 21 million coin limit is hard-coded into its software; changing it would require consensus from a global majority of nodes—a scenario nearly impossible in practice. This design ensures Bitcoin’s promised scarcity remains intact and underpins its trustworthiness.


