Recently, I've been looking at the staking/re-sharing security setup again, and when the returns layer upon layer, people are most likely to also stack the "certainty"… To put it simply, what you get is often just risk packaged to look better: the same collateral bears more commitments, and when something really goes wrong, the correlation instantly maximizes, and the contagion between protocols spreads faster than expected. Currently, the incentives on testnets and the expectations for points are quite heated, and in the group, people ask every day "Will the mainnet issue tokens," I also get tempted, but I care more about: whether the liquidation threshold has enough margin, whether the exit queue is smooth, and whether the conditions for penalties and confiscation are clearly written. Anyway, I’m used to taking screenshots first and then checking a few days later whether I was driven by emotions at that time… That’s all for now.