Raising $2.2 billion, A16Z is determined to fight to the death in Crypto

May 5, a16z crypto, the dedicated crypto VC under Andreessen Horowitz, announced that its fifth fund has completed fundraising, with a size of $2.2 billion. At the same time, CTO Eddie Lazarin was promoted to general partner, becoming the fourth GP of this fund alongside Chris Dixon, Ali Yahya, and Guy Wuollet.

Most English-language media have focused on the framing that “this is the largest fundraising in the current crypto winter,” emphasizing the absolute number of $2.2 billion. But this figure also appeared in 2021, when a16z crypto completed fundraising for its third fund—also totaling $2.2 billion. With five years in between, a bull-market peak in the middle, and two rounds of crypto winter, a16z has bet this number again.

The story behind this number isn’t about “being big”—it’s about “going all-in and sticking with it.”

a16z crypto’s previous dedicated crypto fund, Fund 4, completed fundraising in May 2022, with a size of $4.5 billion—the largest single crypto VC fund in history, and one that has not been surpassed to date. Dropping from $4.5 billion to $2.2 billion means the scale has indeed been cut in half. But in this round of winter, there is only a16z left that can still gather another $2.2 billion to keep betting on crypto.

If you line up the sizes of this institution’s five dedicated crypto funds over eight years, the pacing becomes clearer. Fund 1 (2018, $350 million) and Fund 2 (2020, $515 million) were early attempts. Fund 3 (2021, $2.2 billion) was the first stretch of the industry’s bull market, with its size multiplying by 4. Fund 4 (2022, $4.5 billion) was the peak, doubling in size again. Fund 5 returns to $2.2 billion five years later, which is exactly the same size as Fund 3.

If you connect the peak tops of Fund 3 and Fund 5 with a dashed line, the picture looks like this: within the crypto narrative, a16z crypto has made a full circle and returned to the size of 2021. Since 2018, the institution has cumulatively committed $9.8 billion in capital, nearly half of which ($4.5 billion) went into Fund 4, which is still not fully spent to this day. Fund 5 is not a new wave of adding capital; rather, while Fund 4’s resources have not been fully used and the industry cools again, it continues to replenish the dedicated crypto “ammunition” going forward.

You can also read this chart from another angle. Between Fund 1 and Fund 4, the interval between each fund has been shortening—2 years, then 1 year, then 1 year—and the size has been expanding. This is the typical rhythm of the crypto industry from 2018 to 2022. After Fund 4, the interval suddenly stretches to 4 years.

During these four years, FTX collapsed, DeFi surged back and then retreated again, Bitcoin ETFs were approved in 2024, and a new bull market rose before falling back. Rather than continuing to fund-raise on the same pace as Funds 1–4, a16z crypto first used part of Fund 4’s ammunition before coming back to raise the next fund. On the day Fund 5 was completed, it had already been a full 48 months since Fund 4.

But looking only at a16z crypto’s own curve still doesn’t tell the full story. Whether $2.2 billion is a case of “staying the course” or “following the trend” has to be understood within the shape of the broader industry during the same period.

The reality is that the industry collapsed even more steeply than a16z crypto’s own trajectory. According to Galaxy Digital, global crypto VC investments were about $32.8 billion in 2021, and in 2022 they were still $30.4 billion. Over two years, the total exceeds $63.2 billion—by far the largest injection of risk capital in crypto history. After FTX collapsed, the number in 2023 was cut to $10.1 billion, shrinking by nearly 70%. In 2024 it rebounded slightly to $11.5 billion, and in 2025, according to PitchBook, it returned to roughly $18 billion—falling back to 2020 levels.

When you place a16z crypto’s two rounds of large-scale fundraising onto this curve, the proportions become clear. Fund 4’s $4.5 billion in 2022 made up roughly 15% of the industry, meaning that for every $7 in crypto VC funding, $1 was managed by a16z crypto alone. Fund 5’s $2.2 billion, in the $18 billion industry pool of 2025, represents roughly 12%. In absolute terms, a16z crypto’s fundraising has been cut in half. In relative terms, its share has barely changed as it shrank into a third of the pool.

Once you understand this layer, you understand Fund 5’s true position. Its scale was cut in half, but within the pool that has also shrunk down to one-third, its captured share is almost unchanged. To achieve this, over the past three years, LPs have not cut their crypto allocations to zero—and a16z’s partners also had to convince themselves to “keep spending the ammunition on crypto.”

There is another set of details you can look at separately. Between 2024 and 2025, Multicoin’s AUM rose from about $600 million to a peak of $6 billion, then got slashed to $2.7 billion due to the decline after Bitcoin’s drop in October. In the same period, the valuation of a16z crypto’s portfolio shrank by about 40%. Haun Ventures grew by roughly 30% year over year.

In 2025, Pantera made five companies—including Circle and BitGo—public, distributed profits to LPs, and started raising its fifth fund. In the winter, what industry peers generally did was roughly three things: raise new money, return money to LPs, and expand the investment scope beyond crypto. a16z crypto chose the first one—and only the first one. No returns, no expansion—continuing to invest in crypto.

The third perspective is to look at peers. The comparison between $2.2 billion and $4.5 billion is for a16z crypto itself; the comparison between $18 billion and $32.8 billion is industry-wide; and the final comparison is between peers.

Putting the latest funds from several leading crypto VCs in 2024–2026 side by side: Polychain $400 million, Dragonfly $650 million, Haun Ventures $1 billion, Paradigm’s new fund $1.5 billion (still fundraising), and a16z crypto Fund 5 $2.2 billion. a16z crypto is the largest in this round, but the more critical detail lies in the gap between it and Paradigm.

Paradigm is a crypto VC co-founded in 2018 by former Sequoia partners and Coinbase co-founders. It has long been viewed as a16z crypto’s most direct competitor in the crypto space. Paradigm closed its $850 million early-stage fund “Paradigm Three” in 2024, and then announced its new fund targeting $1.5 billion. According to The Wall Street Journal, the scope of this new fund has expanded from pure crypto to AI, robotics, and other frontier computing. In other words, Paradigm’s partners made the judgment that “investing only in crypto would miss too many opportunities.”

a16z crypto takes the opposite view. On the day the fund was announced, a spokesperson’s response to Fortune was only one line: “Fund 5 will 100% invest in crypto entrepreneurs.” In the VC context of 2026, this is persistence.

For each $1 invested in crypto in 2024, 18 cents went to projects that combine “AI + crypto.” By 2025, this figure more than doubled to 40 cents.

Behind that 40% number is a full change in funding pathways. According to a16z’s January publication, “Why Did We Raise $15B,” the parent company completed a new $15 billion fundraising round in January 2026, distributed across Apps ($1.7B, AI applications), Infrastructure ($1.7B, AI infrastructure), Growth ($6.75B), American Dynamism ($1.176B), Bio ($700M), and Other ($3B, including crypto, fintech, and enterprise software). In the publicly available breakdown, there is no separate category called “Crypto.” Fund 5’s $2.2 billion was completed as a standalone fundraising four months later.

The parent company’s capital pool expanded from $42 billion in May 2024 to over $90 billion in March 2026, but the crypto division’s share dropped from 11% during the Fund 4 period to 2.4% during the Fund 5 period. Internally, crypto has shifted from an “independent segment” to a “bet within the Other pool.” The parent company’s focus has moved away, leaving only a16z crypto still hoping to allocate its capital into crypto.

This is Fund 5’s real position. It is a concentrated bet on crypto within the a16z ecosystem, with its scale cut to half of the previous round—but within a parent company where crypto’s share has already been compressed to 2.4%, it remains the only dedicated crypto fund. According to Fortune, in the late stage of Fund 4, investments already included Babylon (a protocol that lets Bitcoin holders collateralize with BTC), the cross-platform prediction market tool Kairos, and $50 million invested into Solana staking protocol Jito—these are examples of Fund 5’s deployment direction. The deployment target, as stated by Dixon and partners in the announcement, is “to invest in the overlooked part of the cycle and turn new infrastructure into products used daily by ordinary people.”

Only a16z itself remains to stay and go all-in on crypto.

Click to learn about the recruitment rhythm of BlockBeats

Welcome to join the official BlockBeats community:

Telegram subscription group: https://t.me/theblockbeats

Telegram discussion group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App

Twitter official account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia